Golden Visas Linked to Corruption and Organized Crime, UK Government Review Finds

LONDON, UK –  A recent government-commissioned review has revealed that a “small” but significant number of foreign nationals granted so-called “golden visas” through the now-defunct UK Tier 1 Investor scheme may have had links to corruption or organized crime. This has prompted renewed scrutiny of global citizenship-by-investment programs and their role in money laundering and illicit finance.

The findings, published by the Home Secretary, follow the British government’s decision in 2022 to permanently close the Tier 1 Investor visa scheme, a fast-track residency program launched in 2008 to attract foreign investment. 

The program offered UK residency to individuals who invested at least £2 million in the country. However, over the years, the scheme has increasingly been criticized for being vulnerable to abuse by politically exposed persons (PEPS) and those seeking to launder questionable wealth.

“The review has identified several individuals granted visas under this route who were potentially at high risk of being involved in serious financial crime,” the Home Secretary said in a statement to Parliament. “While the majority were genuine investors, the minority who exploited this system for corrupt purposes cannot be ignored.”

Risk Factors: Corruption, Organized Crime, and Unchecked Wealth

The review, which examined the Tier 1 Investor Visa route from 2008 to 2015, found that many of the applicants were from high-risk jurisdictions or held political positions that raised red flags. The fast-tracked due diligence procedures and lack of consistent scrutiny over the origin of funds enabled some individuals with murky financial backgrounds to obtain UK residency and integrate their wealth into the British financial system.

The Home Office flagged concerns that in some cases:

  • Applications were approved despite limited background checks.
  • Funds used for investment originated from opaque offshore entities.
  • Wealth was accumulated rapidly in jurisdictions with poor anti-corruption enforcement.

Transparency International UK has long called for tighter regulation. It has welcomed the review. It noted that the golden visa route allowed “dirty money to flow freely into the UK” with limited checks.

Tier 1 Visa: From Attraction to Liability

When introduced in 2008, the Tier 1 visa scheme was seen as a tool to strengthen the UK’s economy by attracting foreign direct investment. Applicants had to invest at least £2 million in UK bonds, share capital, or loan capital in active and trading UK-registered companies. In return, they received residency rights—and, in some cases, a fast track to British citizenship.

Over 13,000 investor visas were issued between 2008 and 2020. However, concerns began to mount when the UK was accused of providing a haven to kleptocrats and enablers of financial crime, particularly after the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and increased scrutiny of post-Soviet oligarchs’ assets in London.

The government temporarily suspended the program in 2018 to address these concerns but reinstated it shortly after. However, mounting pressure—including geopolitical developments and the rise of transnational financial crime—eventually led to its permanent closure in 2022.

Case Study 1: Russian Oligarch Linked to Sanctioned Bank

One high-profile example involved a Russian businessman, whose Tier 1 visa was granted in 2011. An internal audit later revealed that most of his investment capital had been funnelled through an offshore trust tied to a sanctioned bank in Cyprus. While the applicant was never charged with a crime, the financial trail raised serious questions about the UK’s vetting standards.

After acquiring UK residency, the individual purchased luxury properties in central London and donated to local cultural institutions. However, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the UK government has frozen the individual’s assets and launched an inquiry into how he had acquired UK residency in the first place.

Case Study 2: Chinese National Linked to State-Owned Company Embezzlement

Another example includes a Chinese national who obtained a Tier 1 investor visa in 2012. Subsequent investigations revealed he had been a senior executive at a state-owned enterprise in China before resigning amid an internal corruption probe. 

Funds for his UK investment were routed through a Hong Kong shell company. The UK review flagged this as a missed opportunity to detect potential illicit enrichment, especially given public reporting on the enterprise’s financial irregularities.

The applicant later sought UK citizenship, but the process was halted once allegations became public. Authorities are currently reviewing the source of his investment funds.

International Implications of Golden Visa Programs

The UK is not alone in facing scrutiny over investor visa schemes. Similar programs in Malta, Cyprus, Portugal, and Caribbean nations have drawn criticism from the European Union, which warns that such schemes create systemic vulnerabilities within the bloc. 

In 2022, the European Commission launched infringement procedures against Malta and Cyprus over their citizenship-by-investment programs, asserting they violate EU law by undermining the principle of sincere cooperation and European identity.

“Golden visas are essentially a loophole for the wealthy to buy access to global mobility, legal protections, and financial privacy,” said a policy director at Global Witness. “Without robust background checks and transparent reporting, they become magnets for dirty money.”

Amicus International Offers Lawful Alternatives

As the global trend shifts away from opaque investor visa programs, Amicus International Consulting emphasizes the importance of pursuing legitimate second citizenship and legal identity change programs backed by due diligence and sovereign compliance. 

With headquarters in Canada, Amicus helps clients lawfully establish new identities, second passports, and legal residency in countries offering transparent citizenship-by-investment frameworks.

“Second citizenship shouldn’t be a backdoor for corruption; it should be a pathway to personal freedom, security, and lawful global mobility,” said an Amicus International employee. “We work exclusively with jurisdictions prioritizing due diligence, transparency, and international regulatory compliance.”

Amicus has recently assisted clients from high-risk regions, including Hong Kong, Venezuela, and Lebanon, who sought lawful alternatives after being targeted by political regimes, facing business expropriation, or navigating crumbling economic conditions.

Case Study 3: Venezuelan Entrepreneur Finds Safety and Transparency

In 2023, Amicus International helped a Venezuelan technology entrepreneur acquire second citizenship in Dominica, a country with a well-regarded due diligence process in its citizenship-by-investment program. The client had been the target of political harassment due to his opposition to the Maduro regime. Fearing arrest and expropriation, he turned to Amicus for support.

The firm facilitated a legal name change, citizenship application, and international relocation, all by Dominican and international law. Unlike opaque golden visa programs, Dominica’s CBI scheme requires a full background check, financial disclosure, and security clearance by third-party due diligence agencies.

Case Study 4: Hong Kong Financier Relocates via Legal Identity Change

Another client—a mid-level financier from Hong Kong—approached Amicus following increased surveillance and business suppression after implementing the National Security Law. He sought a second passport to ensure safe business continuity in Europe.

Amicus International worked with him to obtain a Grenada passport under the island’s citizenship-by-investment program, which offers visa-free travel to over 140 countries, including the Schengen Zone and China. The client now operates a fintech firm based in Zurich and has used his new legal identity to conduct banking and business activities without interference from Hong Kong authorities.

Amicus International Consulting

Conclusion: The End of an Era—and a Cautionary Tale

The UK’s closure of the Tier 1 Investor visa scheme and the revelations from the subsequent review underscore the dangers of residency-for-sale schemes lacking transparency and accountability. While most investors may be legitimate, even a few bad actors can pose serious risks to national security, financial integrity, and public trust.

As nations around the world reevaluate golden visa programs in light of security threats and financial transparency, firms like Amicus International Consulting offer an alternative pathway—one rooted in legality, ethics, and sovereignty.

📞 Contact Information
Phone: +1 (604) 200-5402
Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca

Follow Us:
🔗 LinkedIn
🔗 Twitter/X
🔗 Facebook
🔗 Instagram